“Game Over” Talk Could be the Beginning
One hundred and fifty-five million Americans play video games, 44 percent of them are female, according to the Entertainment Software Association (ESA). Yet, female gamers are often the targets of brutal harassment and bullying and even excluded from the video game industry itself.
On Nov. 24, a group of experts on digital culture and justice studies discussed the roles gender and misogyny play in the video game industry and community at the “Game Over?” panel hosted in the Angelina Pedroso Center.
#Gamergate — as it is referred to — is a single smear campaign that brought a dark perspective that would highlight the degradation and alienation of one gender in the history of video games. Within the panel, instances of insulting posts and dark imagery were displayed about the treatment of women in video games through slides.
The event was organized by Adam Messinger, an assistant professor of justice studies and of women’s and gender studies at NEIU. The panel was co-sponsored by the Justice Studies Department and Women’s Resource Center.
Other speakers included Keisha Howard, founder of female pro-gamers community website Sugar Gamers; Fruzsina Eördögh, a digital culture journalist; and Margaret M. Ogarek, Cook County deputy supervisor for the Division of Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence.
Messinger started the panel discussion with a talk on the disparity between the demographics of women in the video game community and within the industry itself.
“Nearly half of all gamers are women,” Messinger said. “It’s a different story though, when we ask the question of who makes the games.”
According to Messinger, the CEOs of various video gaming companies are male, as are 75 percent of video game designers. In addition, he pointed to a study showing that 79 percent of video game box art displays men and that the majority of video game protagonists in single-player games are male.
He moved on to describe how the objectification of female video game characters resulted in them being less represented as strong and independent protagonists.
“Often times, they are highly sexualized,” Messinger said. “The most common images are of women as prostitutes and as strippers. One study suggests that women who play video games regularly are much more likely to accept what are sometimes referred to as ‘rape myths,’ or beliefs that if you believe in them strong enough, you start to think rape is acceptable in some cases.”
Messinger showed how game designers use violent acts towards women as a method of darkening the mood of an event or even as a choice for the player to progress through the plot in such games as Assassin’s Creed, Grand Theft Auto V and God of War.
Eördögh, a digital culture journalist, described the events surrounding #Gamergate and the results of the controversial harassment campaign.
She started her talk explaining the harassment of Zoe Quinn, a video game developer who was targeted in an online smear campaign by her ex-boyfriend, Eron Gjoni. He wrote at length in a blog post — in which he quoted numerous personal details and private communications about his relationship with Quinn and falsely accused her of engaging in a relationship with a video game journalist in exchange for a positive review of her game, Depression Quest.
“The thing that happens a lot with men on the internet is they love coming up with conspiracy theories, and this conspiracy theory was that there are all these feminists that infiltrated the media and they were promoting this feminine agenda,” Eördögh said.
Beyond that post, Eördögh said Gjoni proceeded to go on 4chan Internet Relay Chat rooms and convinced others to harass Quinn by spreading her personal information and lewd photos of her.
“Just to be clear, this all started with trolls,” Eördögh said.
The microphone turned over to Howard, who spoke of her experience playing online in a negative environment.
“One of the things that occurred when #Gamergate happened is that all the girls were figuring out how to respond to it,” Howard said. “Because we all play online and we get all sorts of profanities when they find out you’re a girl playing Call of Duty or Gears of War.”
Howard stood against the harassment and through her following and gaming, sought to empower women and discredit the immature responses from gaming.
Ogarek spoke of her experience in helping victims of internet bullying.
“A victim is a victim,” Ogarek said. “If you’re getting that kind of talk and if you’re the recipient of that hate, you deserve protection. There is no normalizing of rape talk or threat talk.”
The most extreme of harassment explained from Ogarek’s cases is “swatting,” an online prank in which the perpetrator falsely informs the police in the victim’s area of a crime occurring at the victim’s address.
“Basically, you’re doing something that requires a SWAT team to come to your house and bust open your door,” Ogarek said. “Gamers also do this to male gamers on Twitch, which is a funny thing to them.”
Messinger continued on the topic of harassment toward another popular video game analyst named Anita Sarkeesian. Messinger showed examples in which Sarkeesian was taunted online with photoshopped images of violence toward her, sexist remarks and even a take on the video game medium itself.
“Someone created a video game where every time you click the mouse, she becomes more bruised and beaten until the screen turns red,” Messinger said. “So you too can engage in attacking Anita Sarkeesian.”
Messinger also explained the pattern in which men bring up questionable arguments for why females would be socially inferior, with references to the male-dominated military conscription, the lack of paternal rights to child custody and the supposed gender gap in college graduation, among other topics of discussion.
Ogarek saw the experiences of female gamers and the harassment as a chance for women to change the culture of video gaming.
“It all comes back to this fundamental change that has got to start,” Ogarek said. “Perhaps this is going to inspire young women to create new games and new stories, but I also hope this will educate some of the people out there playing the games.”
Your donation will support the student journalists of Northeastern Illinois University's The Independent, either in writers' payment, additional supplies and other items of note. Your contribution will allow us to purchase additional equipment for writers/photographers/illustrators and cover our annual website hosting costs.
Churbles Max • Dec 7, 2015 at 5:32 pm
Its interesting to see people talk out of both sides of their mouths. 155 million american’s are gamers, half of america apparently enjoys sexism and misogyny right? Its so fun! Games are so sexist and discriminatory that half of gamers are women!
I saw this “room of experts” it was recorded by Experiment #626 and it was on par with the UN cyberviolence report which was so bad it had blank citations and citations to peoples harddrive paths. Need proof? Just look at c:\mydocuments\evidence.pdf!!
“expertise” on “cyber” issues tends to involve having read click bait blogs these days, wallowing in an echo chamber of misinformation which is what the media has become these days. XKCD has a comic on this titled “citogenesis”, and this article is a prime example of how uncited unverified information on agenda blogs gets laundered through wikipedia and “experts” into becoming “fact” fit for reprint in other media like newspapers.
GamerGate isn’t a smear campaign, quite the opposite, the media has run a smear campaign on Eron Gjoni who if you didn’t know was a sjw himself, a rad fem, “one of them”, who ended up on the wrong side because he needed to be silenced.
pastebin. com /8n0Ukfsj for links. The fact is that Quinn not only lied to the media, she lied to the courts to get him gagged for over a year, and he’s been fighting against the system in order to set precedent so the laws can’t be abused this way again. Its covered in the indie-fensible video “turnabout gamergate” on youtube as well. The media misrepresentation of this case only proves GamerGates point about corruption in the media, a narrative, free from fact checks will be printed, and reprinted in an echo chamber of low standards until real damage is done. You only have to look at the case of Tim Hunt, has he been made whole? Of course not, he’s just a man, justice simply doesn’t factor into this modern political ideology of the regressive left, its why they are called sjws, aka social justice warriors. They make a mockery of the things they claim to stand for.
Disparities do not imply sexism, or else she is going to have to explain just how sexist against men the prison system is being that it is filled with over 90% men.’
“the thing about men” is that they aren’t a group you can generalize, but this “expert” does regardless. If we are to play this game, the “thing about men on the internet”(the ones she is referring to) is that they cite their facts and they use rational skepticism to back their arguments. Its been no surprise people like Sarkeesian have been calling atheists misogynists these days, people who are skeptical and actually check for citations are “harmful” people, they get in the way of “social justice” agendas. Why check “facts”, don’t you know we are doing good?
Ths mentality of the ends justifying the means is something I’ve seen time and time again from these people, and it explains so much of what we’ve seen. I’m sure you’ve seen Melissa Click and her thuggish behavior at Misourri’s school for journalism, where she threatened a reporter for doing his job, calling in “muscle”, for these people, even professors, their agenda is more important than even things like civil rights. The ends justifies the means, always, and that is a problem. Imagine what woudl have happened if that incident and others were not caught on video?
Anyways this entire panel was caught on video, the video ended with the guy simply challenging the professor with a civil statement, which resulted in the guy storming off, calling the police while claiming that threats were made, when they were clearly not, again, caught on video.
Its interesting they cite “swatting” when every other GamerGate event has been undermined with bomb threats and various accusations and smears. One was the SPJ, the Society of Professional Journalists where they discussed issues of professional ethics.
False accusation is part of the social justice playbook…. This is the real story of GamerGate, and its been going on for over a year now.
pastebin com/8n0Ukfsj various other links and citations.
Justin Moore • Dec 7, 2015 at 1:35 pm
Ok where do I begin with this article that is a steaming pile of narrative crafting.
“#Gamergate — as it is referred to — is a single smear campaign that brought a dark perspective that would highlight the degradation and alienation of one gender in the history of video games. Within the panel, instances of insulting posts and dark imagery were displayed about the treatment of women in video games through slides.”
It is not a smear campaign unless you consider the collective gaming press s******g themselves and smearing it on the walls blaming their audience for why it stinks. The gaming press are the ones pushing the harassing women out of video games narrative which is undeniably false.
“Often times, they are highly sexualized,” Messinger said. “The most common images are of women as prostitutes and as strippers. One study suggests that women who play video games regularly are much more likely to accept what are sometimes referred to as ‘rape myths,’ or beliefs that if you believe in them strong enough, you start to think rape is acceptable in some cases.”
This has nothing to do with corruption in the gaming journalism industry so this can be dismissed but regardless show me this study. Show me any proof to back up this claim.
“Beyond that post, Eördögh said Gjoni proceeded to go on 4chan Internet Relay Chat rooms and convinced others to harass Quinn by spreading her personal information and lewd photos of her.”
Eron never went to 4chan. They dont have relay chat rooms, it is an imageboard. He did not convince others to harass her and spread her modeling shots on the internet (Which by the way she ripped off the photographer for and was extremely disrespectful). It is also ironic considering she was harassing suicidal virgins on their own imageboard WizardChan.
“Basically, you’re doing something that requires a SWAT team to come to your house and bust open your door,” Ogarek said. “Gamers also do this to male gamers on Twitch, which is a funny thing to them.”
You say that gamers are responsible for this but just a couple lines ago said…
“Just to be clear, this all started with trolls,” Eördögh said.
So this means you are making a false equivalency in which you think all gamers are trolls which is not the case.
“One of the things that occurred when #Gamergate happened is that all the girls were figuring out how to respond to it,” Howard said. “Because we all play online and we get all sorts of profanities when they find out you’re a girl playing Call of Duty or Gears of War.”
How would they know you are female unless they can hear your voice or you explicitly mention you are female? Also are you speaking on behalf of all women who are gaming in regards to experiencing mean words?
“Someone created a video game where every time you click the mouse, she becomes more bruised and beaten until the screen turns red,” Messinger said. “So you too can engage in attacking Anita Sarkeesian.”
What does that have to do with anything? There is no established connection in your article but you threw it in anyways.
“Messinger also explained the pattern in which men bring up questionable arguments for why females would be socially inferior, with references to the male-dominated military conscription, the lack of paternal rights to child custody and the supposed gender gap in college graduation, among other topics of discussion.”
What does the Mens Rights Movement have to do with the contraversy at hand? What are their arguments and why are they questionable to you? Are you saying they are saying women are socially inferior and if so please provide me quotes or evidence.
“It all comes back to this fundamental change that has got to start,” Ogarek said. “Perhaps this is going to inspire young women to create new games and new stories, but I also hope this will educate some of the people out there playing the games.”
There is no need for the gaming industry to change. There are already talented women in game development and there are the ones pumping out shovelware who are getting a helping hand from the gaming press because their friendships matter more than their readership.
I hope you are ashamed of yourself for vomiting up this piece of drivel.
Citation Needed • Dec 7, 2015 at 1:54 am
[Citation Needed]
ThirteenthLetter • Dec 7, 2015 at 12:59 am
So the takeaway here is that you did no research and just regurgitated what a bunch of ideological advocates told you. And you work for a college newspaper? Somewhere, my old journalism professor is spinning in his grave.
Emily • Dec 6, 2015 at 11:28 pm
This biggest issue with Gamergate is just how dishonest people like Pablo Medina are when discussing it. Dishonesty is one thing, it’s the hypocrisy that irks me.
Pablo writes things like “Yet, female gamers are often the targets of brutal harassment and bullying and even excluded from the video game industry itself.” and then proceeds to participate in said harassment and bullying by labeling Gamergate as “single smear campaign that brought a dark perspective that would highlight the degradation and alienation of one gender in the history of video games.”
As a transgender woman who has supported Gamergate for more than a year, it’s really frustrating to see this lie repeated time and time again. Why is it always men like Pablo who claim women are welcome in the video game world, but then try to silence us when we speak out regarding the appearance of corruption and conflict of interest in video gaming journalism? From Doritosgate to Jeff Gerstmann’s review of Kane & Lynch for GameSpot, there have long been issues with video game journalism.
And yet, when we call out a male reporter- Nathan Grayson- for providing coverage to a video game that he is listed in the end credits for on both Kotaku and Rock-Paper-Shotgun, we’re somehow participating in harassment?
It’s not true. And you unintentionally illustrate why Gamergate is important in your post with sentences like “He wrote at length in a blog post — in which he quoted numerous personal details and private communications about his relationship with Quinn and falsely accused her of engaging in a relationship with a video game journalist in exchange for a positive review of her game, Depression Quest.”
It’s an odd statement to include, considering both Eron Gjoni and Nathan Grayson have stated this simply isn’t true. Said accusation doesn’t exist anywhere in the 9,000 plus words that is The Zoe Post.
Not that the facts seem to matter. Gamergate has shown it’s very easy for the media to ignore inconvenient minority voices and members of the transgender community simply because we disagree over video game journalism. I get it, Pablo, I’m the wrong kind of woman. I’m reminded of that daily by the crowds against Gamergate, crowed fueled by hateful articles like this that misrepresents who we are and what we stand for.
It’s tough. I’ve been encouraged to commit suicide, I’ve been told I’m not a real woman, I’m been called a gender traitor, I’ve been called at my work by people threatening me. Margaret Ogarek sounds right here: A victim is a victim.
I ask that you stop perpetuating the transphobic hate people like me have received by supporting Gamergate simply because you don’t understand what it is.
tehy • Dec 6, 2015 at 8:34 pm
Pablo, have you ever talked to someone from GamerGate? I think you’ve got a lot of basic facts wrong. I know that, in my months spent talking to people in the movement, it’s never been about harassment or hatred of women (Really, half these guys are far too supportive of women as it is). Rather, it’s about justifiable outrage at the complete lack of ethics, combined with the overgrowth of progressive critics lambasting perfectly fine games for being ‘too sexy’ while hyping up garbage because it promoted the right worldview.
Kat • Dec 4, 2015 at 3:52 pm
Maybe ask Gamergate what they want? They’ve been active for more than a year now. Maybe, just maybe, they have legitimate grievances?
Emily • Dec 9, 2015 at 7:03 pm
They don’t want to engage with Gamergaters, it’s that simple.
I posted a comment here a couple days ago, and it hasn’t gotten past their moderation team.
I do not know why the moderation team doesn’t want the comments of a transgender woman on their website, especially if they’re going to falsely claim that Gamergate “is a single smear campaign that brought a dark perspective that would highlight the degradation and alienation of one gender in the history of video games.”
It’s just odd that a man named Pablo Medina is able to make that false claim unchallenged, and when a woman speaks up, they’re silenced.