“Players won’t be strong-armed”; Workplace safety, unfair compensation emerge as concerns among MLB players

May 12, 2020


MLB owners approved a plan Monday to restart the suspended MLB season by early July. However, concerns surrounding hazardous workplace conditions and unfair compensation models emerged as concerns among MLB players and personnel.

On March 26, the Major League Baseball Players Association (MLBPA) agreed to a prorated salary model determined by the number of games played during the abbreviated 2020 season. However, restrictions on travel and mass gatherings at the federal, state and local levels negated the effectiveness of that plan, forcing owners to consider the financial forfeitures of lost gate earnings, which account for approximately 40% of team revenue. 

Under the MLB owner’s proposal, players would earn a 50/50 split of revenue collected from both regular season and postseason competition, an offer the MLBPA is likely to reject in favor of the guaranteed earnings agreed upon on March 26.

MLBPA executive director Tony Clark hinted at the union’s intention to reject the new compensation model. In an interview with The Athletic, Clark opined that the proposed 50-50 revenue share mirrors a salary cap, a measure historically rejected by the MLBPA.

“A system that restricts player pay based on revenues is a salary cap, period,” said Clark. “This is not the first salary cap proposal our union has received. It probably won’t be the last.

“That the league is trying to take advantage of a global health crisis to get what they’ve failed to achieve in the past — and to anonymously negotiate through the media for the last several days — suggests they know exactly how this will be received.

“None of this is beneficial to the process of finding a way for us to safely get back on the field and resume the 2020 season — which continues to be our sole focus.”

MLB mega-agent Scott Boras echoed Clark’s sentiments, restating the inclination of MLB owners to offer a prorated salary absent fan attendance. According to Boras, players exhibited a willingness to accept up to 40% pay reductions to “amicably” resume play.

“The players I represent are unified in that they reached an agreement and they sacrificed anywhere from 30 to 40% of their salaries so that the games could amicably continue,” said Boras. “The owners represented during that negotiation that they could operate without fans in the ballpark. Based on that, we reached an agreement and there will not be a renegotiation of that agreement.”

Players also took to social media to express concern regarding player safety. Washington Nationals relief pitcher Sean Doolittle emphasized the importance of workplace safety. According to Doolittle, the assurance of safe workplace standards has been relegated to an afterthought as negotiations progress.

Bear with me, but it feels like we’ve zoomed past the most important aspect of any MLB restart plan: health protections for players, families, staff, stadium workers and the workforce it would require to resume a season,” tweeted Doolittle. “Here are some things I’ll be looking for in the proposal…”

Doolittle continued by listing the potential long-term consequences of the novel coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic. The 2019 World Series champion also stated his intention to heed the advice of leading health officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci. You can read Doolittle’s Twitter thread here.

In a Monday afternoon tweet, San Diego Padres pitcher Phil Hughes echoed Doolittle’s concerns.  “I know everyone wants baseball back this year, but players won’t be strong-armed into unsafe work conditions and unfair compensations,” wrote Hughes.

As negotiations between MLB and MLBPA representatives advance, it appears increasingly likely that pay structure and workplace standards will surface as an obstacle hindering progression. Hopefully, the two sides can discover a solution that ensures fair compensation and player safety while allowing MLB baseball in 2020.

Read more by Matthew Rago:

MLB owners approve plan to start season by July

View Comments (3)

NEIU Independent • Copyright 2023 • FLEX WordPress Theme by SNOLog in

Comments (3)

Comments are subject to review for slurs and offensive language. Comments will not be edited except to modify profanity.
All NEIU Independent Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • K

    Keith CampbellMay 14, 2020 at 2:11 am

    Kent most those jobs you listed are also union jobs which is why we have them. Owners have to take the hit just like the players do and all of us for that matter. To me this season is a wash but I don’t think players should go back under any circumstances that don’t feel safe for everyone involved . Don’t hate the players for making more money then you.
    There is no crying in baseball
    Union Strong

  • M

    MichaelMay 13, 2020 at 9:57 am

    Fans calling players names because they won’t risk their health to provide you with entertainment is just wrong! So what if you’re an invalid stay at home bored with watching reruns? That’s your problem not the players. They really don’t owe you anything at all. We all love baseball and want it back but not at the risk of these players and stadium workers health.

  • K

    Kent LindbergMay 12, 2020 at 9:35 pm

    It is predictable that a union would reject any offer. The hell with the fan sitting at home watching games from 1982 ain’t
    that great. You pampered over paid bastards. Go work on a loading dock, drive a truck, be a window washer or be a house husband. Go ahead and count your millions. Maybe the Dems. will send you an unemployment check plus they will send all a COVID-19 relief check. The hell with someone like me, a semi invalid no baseball. For shame on all you selfish bastards.